Daily News Reports »
Grizzly Bear Reintroduction Comment Period Extended
by KayDee Gilkey, click here for bio
Program: Land & Livestock Report
Date: March 17, 2017
Click on the play button to listen to report.
Download Report: Grizzly_Bear_Reintroduction_Comment_Period_Extended.mp3
The draft EIS includes a no action alternative, plus three action alternatives that would seek to restore a reproducing population of approximately 200 bears through the capture and release of grizzly bears into the North Cascades Ecosystem.
U.S. Congressman Dan Newhouse who represents this area shares that he concerns about ramping up the grizzly bear population artificially.
Newhouse: “There are a lot of issues with that — safety concerns, tourism concerns. If they come in naturally from Canada. There has been some crossover back and forth over time. That seems a more natural progression — I’d be okay with that. That is kind of that taking no action option. But to artificial introduce them — to me — I haven’t heard frankly, from any constituents yet that are clamoring to move forward with this. Like I’ve said before, the people who have to live with the bears should be the people that we listen to; and not someone who is not from the area who may good intentions but unrealistic notions of what the grizzlies would bring to the area. So that has been my goal all a long that the citizens of Okanogan County have the opportunity to express their opinion.”
Recent Reports from Land & Livestock Report
- Colorado Hemp for Cattle Feed Study
- Don’t Let the Name Fool You
- CO Bill to Reinstate COOL Was Not Way to Proceed
- How You Handle Your Cows
- Saving Nickels Can Often Cost Dollars
Click here to see Archived Reports